Bio 260 Assignment

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science . Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action. American Association for the Advancement of Science; Washington, DC: 2011. http://www.visionandchange.org/finalreport.

2. Anderson LW, et al. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman; New York: 2001.

3. Berzonsky WA, Richardson KD. Referencing Science: teaching undergraduates to identify, validate, and utilize peer reviewed online literature. J Nat Resour Life Sci Educ. 2008;37:8–13.

4. Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals: handbook i: cognitive domain. Longmans, Green; New York, NY: 1956.

5. Burns JC, Okey JR, Wise KC. Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II. J Res Sci Teach. 1985;22:169–177. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660220208.[Cross Ref]

6. Chisman JK. Introducing college students to scientific literature and the library. J Coll Sci Teach. 1998;28:39–42.

7. Choe SW, Drennan PM. Analyzing scientific literature using a jigsaw group activity: piecing together student discussions on environmental research. J Coll Sci Teach. 2001;30:328–330.

8. Coil D, Wenderoth MP, Cunningham M, Dirks C. Teaching the process of science: faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010;9:524–535. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

9. Gehring KM, Eastman DA. Information fluency for undergraduate biology majors: applications of inquiry-based learning in a developmental biology course. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008;7:54–63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-10-0091.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

10. Gillen CM. Criticism and interpretation: teaching the persuasive aspects of research articles. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006;5:34–38. doi: 10.1187/cbe.05-08-0101.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

11. Gillen CM, Vaughan J, Lye BR. An online tutorial for helping nonscience majors read primary research literature in biology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2004;28:95–99. doi: 10.1152/advan.00044.2003.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

12. Halliday AC, Devonshire IM, Greenfield AD, Dommett EJ. Teaching medical students basic neurotransmitter pharmacology using primary research resources. Adv Physiol Educ. 2010;34:205–212. doi: 10.1152/advan.00005.2010.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

13. Herman C. Reading the literature in the jargon-intensive field of molecular genetics: making molecular genetics accessible to undergraduates using a process-centered curriculum. J Coll Sci Teach. 1999;28:252–254.

14. Holloszy JO, Smith EK, Vining M, Adams S. Effect of voluntary exercise on longevity of rats. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59:826–831.[PubMed]

15. Hoskins SG, Stevens LM, Nehm RH. Selective use of the primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory. Genetics. 2007;176:1381–1389. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.071183.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

16. Impey C, Buxner S, Antonellis J, Johnson E, King C. A twenty-year survey of science literacy among college undergraduates. J Coll Sci Teach. 2011;40:31–37.

17. Janick-Buckner D. Getting undergraduates to critically read and discuss primary literature. J Coll Sci Teach. 1997;27:29–32.

18. Koseracki CA, Carey MF, Colicelli J, Levis-Fitzgerald M. An intensive primary-literature–based teaching program directly benefits undergraduate science majors and facilitates their transition to doctoral science programs. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006;5:340–347. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-02-0144.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

19. LeBlanc J, Jobin M, Côté J, Samson P, Labrie A. Enhanced metabolic response to caffeine in exercise-trained human subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59:832–837.[PubMed]

20. McElroy AR, McNaughton FC. A project-based approach to the use of biological literature. J Biol Educ. 1979;13:52–57. doi: 10.1080/00219266.1979.9654226.[Cross Ref]

21. Muench SB. Choosing primary literature in biology to achieve specific educational goals. J Coll Sci Teach. 2000;29:255–260.

22. National Academy of Sciences . A new biology for the 21st century: ensuring the united states leads the coming biology revolution. The National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2009. [PubMed]

23. Pechenik JA, Tashiro JS. The graphing detective: an exercise in critical reading, experimental design and data analysis. Am Biol Teach. 1992;54:432–435. doi: 10.2307/4449534.[Cross Ref]

24. Porter JA, et al. Integration of information and scientific literacy: promoting literacy in undergraduates. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010;9:536–542. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0006.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

25. Roecker L. Introducing students to the scientific literature. J Chem Educ. 2007;84:1380. doi: 10.1021/ed084p1380.[Cross Ref]

26. Rybarczyk B. Incorporating primary literature into science learning. In: Mintzes Joel, Leonard William H., editors. Handbook of college science teaching. National Science Teachers Association Press; USA: 2006. pp. 159–166.

27. Snow CE. Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science. 2010;328:450–452. doi: 10.1126/science.1182597.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

28. Speth EB, et al. 1, 2, 3, 4: Infusing quantitative literacy into introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010;9:323–332. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-03-0033.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

29. Tang BL, Gan YH. Preparing the senior or graduating student for graduate research. Biochem Molec Biol Educ. 2005;33:277–280. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2005.49403304277.[Cross Ref]

30. Weintraub J. Teaching students to evaluate the accuracy of science information on the internet. In: Mintzes Joel, Leonard William H., editors. Handbook of College Science Teaching. National Science Teachers Association Press; USA: 2006. pp. 261–266.

31. Wenk L, Tronsky L. First-year students benefit from reading primary research articles. J Coll Sci Teach. 2011;40:60–67.

Biostatistics - Biology 260 Fall 2016 Syllabus and Schedule Instructor: Dr. Darren Johnson Office: HSCI 132 Office Hours: Mon, Wed: 1-2pm; or by appointment Email: [email protected]Meeting Times: M, W 8:00-8:50 LH 151; Labs meet in HSCI-073 Prerequisites: Biol 211 & 211L or 207 or MICR 200; Math 111, 113, 119A or 122 Required Items: The Analysis of Biological Data(Textbook by Whitlock & Schluter, 2nd Edition) Biostatistics Lab Manual– Fall 2016 Edition Calculator capable of summing one or two variables. It may simplify things if it also sums their squares, and cross-products simultaneously Recommended software: R Studio– a graphical user interface (GUI) for running R– a programming language designed for running statistical analyses. Both R Studio and R are freely available, work on both PCs and macs and can be downloaded from www.rstudio.comGOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND LEARNING OUTCOMES The course covers basic data analysis techniques and underlying principles necessary to effectively design experiments, to promote effective data collection, and to analyze and interpret biological data, whether these data result from observational or manipulative/experimental studies. The methods are generally applicable to all areas of biology including microbiology, cell biology, genetics, population biology, and environmental biology. The lectures will cover the basic principles of data analysis and statistical decisionmaking while the laboratory covers the practical aspects of how to go about analyzing data. In addition, the labs will reinforce material covered in lecture. The material you learn in this course is an introduction to one of themost commonly used tools in all of biology. A proper understanding of statistics is essential to a successful career as professional biologists or health professionals.

0 Replies to “Bio 260 Assignment”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *