Example of a Argumentative essay on History about:
civil rights / freedom / society / government / nineteenth century / revolution / rights / women / equity / voting / slavery
The struggle of African Americans and women for freedom and civil rights in the U.S. was colored with blood and disillusionment. While some of them were seeking consolation in the sincere fight for natural human freedom, others were trying to prove to themselves and the rest of the American society that the government did not have the power to govern civil relations in the U.S. Slavery and obedience are forever carved into the 19th century’s history in the United States, having turned into a continuous fight for the right for self-realization. For the majority of African Americans, their journey to freedom has turned into the journey to civil rights revolution – the revolution that has brought with it the new reality, where white dominance was no longer relevant. Thesis: all men have the right for revolution; but revolutions do not necessarily lead to the formation of a new democratic society; rather, revolutions result in the emergence of a new type of civil majority that can hardly achieve all goals and objectives of this revolutionary movement.
The struggle for freedom and the opposition to civil obedience was difficult, bloody, and tiresome. For the majority of enslaved African Americans, the fight for freedom was the central goal of their miserable lives. Kidnapping and violence were characteristic of their daily performance, but none of them was prepared to reconcile with the increasing social discrepancies between the black and the white. “From what I can recollect of these battles, they appear to have been irruptions of one little state or district on the other to obtain prisoners or booty. Perhaps they were incited to this by those traders who brought the European goods I mentioned amongst us. Such a mode of obtaining slaves in Africa is common, and I believe morc are procured this way and by kidnapping than any other” (Equiano). It is difficult to neglect the anger, hatred, and rage with which Africans were fighting for their natural right to be free; it is difficult to neglect the anger and hatred with which they were treated after being enslaved. It is difficult to neglect the feeling of dominance that governed white people in their striving to acquire more slaves and to turn them into the instruments of unbearable labor. Enslavement could not have any social, economic, or legal justifications; yet, it remains and will forever remain a part of our history. The life of slaves was far from fabulous; many of them found themselves “regretting their own existence, and wishing themselves dead; and but the hope of being free, they had no doubt that they should have killed themselves, or done something for which they should have been killed” (Douglass). Nothing could push the slaves to changing their negative attitudes to life, except for release from enslavement and long-anticipated freedom. While slaves were vainly fighting for freedom, they have gradually realized the futility of their social attempts to overcome long-term social traditions.
For years, the American society was characterized by the growing pressure of the so-called “white dominance” imposed on other nations under the cover of “technical advancement and economic progress”. Simultaneously, the American government was creating a new type of civil vision, where citizens were primarily subjects, and only afterwards, human beings. “All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable” (Thoreau). Thus, how could one speak about the equality and equity of civil rights between the races, while the government officially refused to promote public democratic ideals? Slavery was one of the darkest periods in human history; yet, the abolition of slavery in the United States did not bring the anticipated results, and those fighting for freedom found themselves in the civil vacuum, unable to protect themselves from external social pressures.
All men have the right for revolution; the fight for freedom and the civil movement against slavery was just another proof for the fact that America was incapable of developing and implementing effective legislative policies that would support the civil rights of the black majority. “No man with a genius for legislation has appeared in America. They are rare in the history of the world. There are orators, politicians, and eloquent men, by the thousand; but the speaker has not yet opened his mouth to speak who is capable of settling the much-vexed questions of the day” (Thoreau). While African Americans were dreaming of becoming free, women were similarly preoccupied with their striving to establish gender equality. As African American slaves viewed their masters as tyrannical by nature, the same were female attitudes toward men who had the right to vote: “that your sex are naturally tyrannical is a truth so thoroughly established as to admit of no dispute; but such of you as wish to be happy willingly give up – the harsh tide of master for the more tender and endearing one of friend” (Adams). Unfortunately, the fight for gender equity and the fight against slavery were nothing more but the realization of one’s right for revolution. It is difficult to argue to Thoreau: all men (and now, women) have the right for revolution, but the fight for equity and freedom was thorny, and beyond winning the right for freedom and the right to vote, the fighters had a difficult task of changing public perceptions about themselves. Revolutions bring dramatic changes, but they rarely lead us to achieving the anticipated social results. Moreover, revolutions can never satisfy all our social needs and cannot satisfy all participants of the particular social fight. African Americans have finally defeated the long lasting stereotypes regarding subordination of the black people; simultaneously, the current social emphasis on the increasing domination of the white society suggests that African Americans were not able to achieve all social goals. Women have certainly won the right to vote, but have they become happier? “All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it, a playing with right and wrong, with moral questions; and betting naturally accompanies it. The character of the voters is not staked. I case my vote, perchance, as I think right; but I am not vitally concerned that that right should prevail” (Thoreau).
All men and women have the right for revolution. All men and women have the right to defend their civil freedoms and equity. All men and women, however, find themselves unable to satisfy all social needs, and with one revolution coming to a logical end, the need for another revolutionary movement is never satisfied. The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, The Letter between Abigail Adams and her Husband John Adams, Thoreau’s On the Duty of Civil Disobedience, and Narrative of Life of Frederick Douglass suggest that the social fight and the striving to have more civil rights will never come to an end. Rather, it will turn into a continuous process of proving to ourselves that we are still able to use our right for revolution, even when such revolutions do not bring the anticipated civil and social results.
The way of African Americans to freedom was not easy; nor was the way of women to gender equity. However, with the right to vote, and with the right for being free, have these people become happier? Certainly, primary historical documents imply the growing need for changing the existing structure of social relations; yet, these very documents imply that we were unable to satisfy all social needs. Abolition of slavery and gender equity have turned into the two revolutionary achievements that have turned the course of history and have also predetermined gradual change of social attitudes towards voting rights and slavery. However, as African Americans and women were proving their right for rebellion, they faced the growing social challenges in the form of long-lasting attitudes toward slavery and voting rights. Ultimately, when the need for one revolution is satisfied, it necessarily brings the need for another revolution, turning rebellion into a never ending historical process.
Adams, A. “Letters Between Abigail Adams and Her Husband John Adams.” 1776. The Liz
Library. 30 November 2008. http://www.thelizlibrary.org/suffrage/abigail.htm
Douglass, F. “Excerpt from Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass.” 1845. The
Teachers, Schools, and Society Reader. 30 November 2008. http://coe.winthrop.edu/collinsa/EDUC_490_Spring_'07/Frederick%20Douglass%20Narrative,%20excerpt.pdf
Equiano, O. “The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano or Gustavus Vassa the
African.” 1789. Washington State University. 30 November 2008. http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_2/equiano.html
Thoreau, H.D. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience.” 1849. Project Gutenberg. 30 November
The Civil Rights Movement Of The 1960'S
In the history of the United States there have been many social changes that have occurred. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s was one of the most significant and important for the equality of all people. Since the abolition of slavery in 1863, there had been a continuous conflict between the races of people who live in the United States. Rights were violated on a consistent basis, purely because of the color of that person’s skin. Unfortunately many of the changes that the movement fought for brought on a violent opposition from many white southerners and that led to the violent deaths of some of the famous leaders of the Civil Rights Movement. It also led to two pretty distinct groups of black activists. One group was rather violent, and one believed in peaceful nonviolent resistance.
Violence Breeds Violence
One side of this coin was more militant groups who demanded change or they threatened violent activity. The Black Panthers were a great example of this type of organization. Although they did preach violence, this organization also provided some much needed child care infrastructure to many black citizens all over the country. The Muslims also posed a violent threat, as leaders like Malcolm X, stated consistently that blacks deserve change and equality and if they aren’t given it, they should take it. Although toward the end of his life, he became more reconcilable, he was murdered not by the white opposition, but from fundamental opposition within his own organization. Violence was a part of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s but it was the far less effective force in leading to change. Violence leads to fear and separation, and ultimately to only more violence.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was the leader of the Civil Rights Movement and he preached strict nonviolent resistance. This meant that protesters would violate laws and traditions which were racist and discriminatory, but wouldn’t resist any action by the police or government or both. This led to young peaceful African Americans being sprayed with water hoses, and punched and kicked as they simply walked in a peaceful protest. It also led to sit ins at establishments that practiced segregation, or at the college buildings where black Americans were unable to enroll, not because they weren’t intelligent enough, but because they happened to be born with a dark skin pigmentation.
In the end, Martin Luther King was killed by an assassin, but his death couldn’t change his message. All men are the same, it is the content of their character by which they should be judged not the color of their skin. This is a message that is accepted as a matter of fact today and the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s is largely responsible for this.